Seminars

Lasso and ridge regression are well established and successful models for variance reduction and, for the lasso, variable selection. However, they come with a disadvantage of an increased bias in the estimator. In this seminar, I will talk about our general method that learns individual weights for each term in the regularisation penalty (e.g. lasso or ridge) with the goal to reduce the bias. To bound the amount of freedom for the model to choose the weights, a new regularisation term, that imposes a cost for choosing small weights, is introduced. If the form of this term is chosen wisely, the apparent doubling of the number of parameters vanishes, by means of solving for the weights in terms of the parameter estimates. We show that these estimators potentially keep the original estimators’ fundamental properties and experimentally verify that this can indeed reduce bias.

A number of remarkable recent results in profinite rigidity use a theorem of Friedl and Vidussi that connects fibring of 3-manifolds with non-vanishing of twisted Alexander polynomials. One such result, due to Liu, states that there are only finitely many finite volume hyperbolic 3-manifolds whose fundamental groups have the same set of finite quotients. In the first part of this talk, based on joint work with Dawid Kielak, we will look at relatives of the theorem of Friedl and Vidussi for LERF groups and it's connections to profinite rigidity. In the second part of the talk, based on ongoing joint work with Monika Kudlinska, we will discuss an analogue of Liu's result for irreducible hyperbolic free-by-cyclic groups.

The general motivation standing behind this research is to understand relationships between dynamical and model-theoretic properties of definable [topological] groups and between dynamical properties of groups of automorphisms of first order structures and model-theoretic properties of the underlying theories. More specifically, our goal is to understand model-theoretic consequences of various notions of amenability.

Among the notions of amenability that we are interested in are: definable amenability of a definable group, classical amenability of a topological group, and, more generally, [weak] definable topological amenability of a definable topological group. We also introduce and study amenable theories.

The consequences of amenability that we obtain are the appropriate versions of G-compactness: for first order theories this is the equality of Lascar strong types and Kim-Pillay strong types; for definable [topological] groups this is the equality of suitably defined connected components $G^{000}$ and $G^{00}$ of the group $G$ in question.

Among our main technical tools, of interest in its own right, is an elaboration on and strengthening of the Massicot-Wagner version of the stabilizer theorem, and also some results about measures and measure-like functions.

My series of talks will be based on my preprint “Amenability and definability” joint with Ehud Hrushovski and Anand Pillay. In the first series of talks, I will focus on the context of definable [topological] groups; the second series will be devoted to our new notion of amenable theory.

Informally, a real number is normal in base $b$ if in its $b$-ary expansion, all digits and blocks of digits occur as often as one would expect them to, uniformly at random. Kechris asked several questions involving descriptive complexity of sets of normal numbers. The first of these was resolved in 1994 when Ki and Linton proved that the set of numbers normal in base $b$ is $\Pi_3^0$-complete. Further questions were resolved by Becher and Slaman. Many of the techniques used in these proofs can be used elsewhere. We will discuss recent results where similar techniques were applied to solve a problem of Sharkovsky and Sivak and a question of Kolyada, Misiurewicz, and Snoha. Furthermore, we will discuss a recent result where the set of numbers that are continued fraction normal, but not normal in any base $b$, was shown to be complete at the expected level of $D_2(\Pi_3^0)$. An immediate corollary is that this set is uncountable, a result (due to Vandehey) only known previously assuming the generalized Riemann hypothesis.